(no subject)
Oct. 13th, 2005 12:49 pmIt occurs to me as I look at new phones that the there have been periods in my life where I carried around disposable cameras to try and capture as much as possible. The only thing that kept me from having the camera permanently glued to my face was the cost of film printing (between film and developing, about a buck a print). If I had had a digital camera, or - god forbid - a cameraphone, I would have taken terrabytes of photos. You'd be able to make stop motion films out of them.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-13 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-13 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-13 05:58 pm (UTC)They are *also* good for playing games. But any game worth its metaphorical salt will have a sound on/off option before the first melody anyway.
/snobbery
no subject
Date: 2005-10-13 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-13 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-13 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-13 07:49 pm (UTC)In college there are always occasions that merit pictures - whether it's the year coming to an end, or dean's date, or halloween on the street or drop trou - there are always "special" things happening. And because of that, it becomes much more acceptable to whip out the camera.
I also took a lot of photos in college because I was the Wildcats archivist. It was my job to be the shutterbug, so it wasn't awkward to be always asking people to pose for photos.
As you can see, I've spent way too much time thinking about the social implications of picture taking. Or it could just be that I'm six years behind on my scrapbooks anyways and I don't want to make it any worse.