ivyfic: (batfax)
[personal profile] ivyfic

The Village was beautiful, as are all of Shyamalan's films, but the plot is completely moronic. I will not analyze why the plot doesn't work, I will only say that all the justifications for the way things are in the village are based on the film-making, not the characters. Why is red the bad color? So the Shyamalan can play around with color schemes. Why do they think it's 1897? Because he's hoodwinking the audience. Why do they have so many damn lamps with no way to get kerosene? So we have moody evening shots. Why do the children know about guns and money? Well, we'll ignore that.

A few other nitpicks. No fair giving Joaquin less than a page of dialogue and then stabbing him (though that was a beautiful scene - my favorite of the movie). I came to the movie for three things: James Newton Howard (pretty good), M. Night Shyamalan (somebody take his pen away, please) and Joaquin Phoenix. No fair putting the eye-candy in a coma.

I get that Shyamalan is being all Hitchcock-y with the cameos, but his appearance has the effect of a small atomic bomb going off in the film. He's much too damn obvious. He completely throws me out of the story. Hitchcock at least had the sense to be in the background and in the beginning, and he never gave himself lines. In "Signs," when one of the characters points to him and says, "Is that him?" I thought, yeah, that's the director, why is he on camera?

*Slash-notice* When Noah went to see Lucius (Joaquin) and was upset, I thought for a moment it was because he was in love with Lucious, not Ivy. Tell me that wasn't a gay look. Until he pulled six inches of steel out of Joaquin's stomach of course (which I also thought was gay until I saw what his hand was doing down there).

I get the point of this movie. I really do. By running from your fear, you create what you fear. That's why Noah has to be the murderer. He is the epitome of innocence in this village and therefore has to be the vessel for the evil they sought to escape. But this would have been more effective if the film hadn't undermined it. I mean, isn't raising your children in absolute mortal terror kind of bad? Ivy comments that Lucious is the only one unafraid. That means everyone else (who isn't in on it) is scared all the time. That's not exactly preserving innocence.

I still think Shyamalan is fantastic film-maker, but I think he needs to reexamine his formula. The trick ending in "Sixth Sense" was completely pivotal to the movie. It redefined and justified everything. When I first saw it, I was amazed at the sheer artistry - the film told us everything and nothing at the same time. "Unbreakable," since it was about the blurring of fiction and reality, also needed its surprise ending, though many disagree. If I did find the aliens in "Signs" disappointing, at least there was a satisfying click as all the pieces fell into place. Here also the trick ending underlines the central conflict of the movie - faith that there is a plan for our lives.

This? This was crap. Not only did I know it was modern times outside from the start (think about it, what other "surprise" could there be when someone goes outside?) I felt no sense that some great mystery had been revealed to me. And choosing to stay in the Village? That didn't make any sense to me. Especially with Joaquin's heavy breathing over the final moments of the film. Shyamalan should have been satisfied at revealing Noah as the monster. This was the surprise that redefined the film, but he undercut this by showing him attacking Joaquin. I knew it was Noah at the end, it had to be. All in all, the end made the rest of the film non-sensical, when it should make the rest of the film work. As I said before, someone take the pen away from Shyamalan. He needs to try a hand at directing someone else's work.


The Village may have been a disappointment, but I got my seven bucks worth when I saw the Batman trailer. Oh, baby.

Date: 2004-08-10 08:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veryschway.livejournal.com
I totally saw the gay in that Noah/Lucius scene. I should have known I wouldn't be the only one!

I'm with you--this movie was so much less than the sum of its parts. Strong acting, strong cinematography, strong editing, and it all adds up to one big dud. I'm not the type of filmgoer who finds pleasure in trying to unravel the mystery. So I felt really cheated when the "surprise ending" was something I'd assumed was supposed to be obvious from the beginning. Shyamalan's refusal to take a stand on the villagers' decision to stay also left a bad taste in my mouth. The moralizing at the end of Signs, I could stomach because the movie was otherwise so wonderful. I couldn't be so generous to this film.

Date: 2004-08-11 12:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ivy03.livejournal.com
My aunt and uncle saw the gay (even though they refuse to see it in Smallville. Well, they've only seen s1, I'm reserving judgement until they see Red).

Village is completely stuck in my head. I desperately want to rewatch it for the ten minutes leading up to and including the stabbing but refuse to watch the rest of it. Up until that point it's a good film. There are even parts in the end that are good, though I got bored with her walking through the woods. Feel bad for the park ranger, though. I think this is joining the legion of bad movies I love (right up there with The Shadow and Sleepy Hollow, though for different reasons).

By the way, saw your vote for my story in the Pretender awards. Muchos gracias for the support! I'm just hoping it makes more people read it.

Date: 2004-08-11 12:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veryschway.livejournal.com
The Shadow is not a bad movie! LOL

Up until that point it's a good film.
Yeah, one of the things I found freaky about this film was how much potential it had, and how completely Shyamalan managed to squander that potential.

Muchos gracias for the support!
Totally! It's a great fic! :)

Date: 2004-08-11 12:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ivy03.livejournal.com
Come on! The Shadow is ridiculous! There's one scene where the heroine is in the front and Ian McKellan is in the back of the frame and you can see the line where they cut two shots together. The couch doesn't even line up.

Not to mention stunning dialogue like:
"That's a nice tie."
"Brooks Brothers."
"You're a sociopath."

But as I've said, I still love it. Even though it has evil long-haired Alec with disgusting fingernails.

Date: 2004-08-12 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veryschway.livejournal.com
hahaha--that is one of my favorite bits of dialogue in film ever, I swear to God. It's the elegant pause between "Brooks Brothers" and "You're a sociopath." It's the way Alec cocks his head ever so slightly to the side and gets a little twinkle in his eye when he delivers that sociopath line. ::sighs::

Date: 2004-08-12 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veryschway.livejournal.com
and the nod! oh I forgot the exasperated little nod.

Date: 2004-08-12 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veryschway.livejournal.com
Oh! And I'm not even in one of the markets where they show the Batman trailer! Yargh!

Profile

ivyfic: (Default)
ivyfic

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 27th, 2026 08:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios