Stuff that I've been watching
Nov. 23rd, 2010 01:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A fantastic show that I am terribly sad though not at all surprised was cancelled. (Seriously--someone greenlighted this for network TV?) Ian McShane is mesmerizing. David I was kind of meh about, but that's largely because I know David was not always so great a person in his later life, so it's hard for me to be the innocent neophyte hero act.
The disorienting thing was that a lot of the show was filmed at Sands Point, a place I have walked many times with my parents (and where the recent Renn Faire was). The inside of the Benjamins' house is there, as is the terrace overlooking the Sound. The most distracting bit was that they used part of the walking path, a little dell with a foot bridge, for all their scenes of the border of Gath. And I know that location so well it couldn't help but look like kids playing dress-up in their backyard to me. Like, oh, if you turn the camera just this way, you'd see the parking lot! I wonder if this is how people in Vancouver feel all the time.
I remember there being some dust-up on my f-list when this was airing about spoilers, but I can't remember who was upset or what the spoiler was and now I'm curious. Nothing in the series struck me as particularly earth shaking (and I say this with no deep knowledge of this part of the story in the Bible--I'm much more familiar with David's later life). In the commentary for the first episode, there was also a spoiler about a certain character getting killed...that wasn't killed. Unless I missed it. How odd.
Well, that was a crap film. I mean, that's what I expected. But it wasn't crap because it mucked about with the Iliad. I can deal with that. It was more that there wasn't really a main character. Or a main plot. I didn't care about anyone. It was just massive battle scene, some excuse to pause the action and have talky scenes (at one point, one of the people says, "I think that's enough for today," or something like that and both sides stop for the day which is just--what? seriously?) and then another massive battle scene. And since everyone knows about the Trojan horse, the movie had an inevitability that removed any possibility of dramatic tension.
Brad Pitt was awfully pretty in it, though. And I got a kick out of the fact that the Mycenaean throne room had the design from the Lion Gate blown up huge and over the throne. (One of my friends climbed on top of that gate, much to the horror of our classics professor chaperone.)
The thing about doing a movie about Troy is that this was the foundational story of the Greeks. After the fall of the Mycenaean civilization, there were a couple hundred years with no writing at all, and then when written works start appearing again, what are the first? The Iliad and the Odyssey. The story of Troy has so much richness, and says so much about how the Greeks viewed human nature and humanity's relationship to the gods, it seems impossible that with that story it could be turned into this flat, lifeless thing. And yet, there we go.
I've just started on Fringe--only five episodes in!--so please refrain from spoilers. So far it feels like an X-Files knock-off to me. I loved X-Files, but for its monster of the week episodes, not for its mytharc. And Fringe has the same hand-wavy, government conspiracy, let's jerk the audience around as much as possible and use "conspiracy" as an excuse for all our plot holes feel to it. Also, so far that monsters of the week have not been that thrilling and can barely help but be X-Files retreads. They seem to be trying for novelty by making them gorier.
And zero points from me for having a demon pregnancy in the second episode. It seems like an inevitability when there's a female lead. This is also terribly sexist of me, but I feel like male writers are way more obsessed with how horrifying pregnancy is than women. Don't get me wrong--pregnancy scares the shit out of me. But I'm kind of tired of being told how disgusting it is by male writers. It's like Stephen King's obsession with menstruation. Just stop it.
I also don't particularly like Olivia, but that's mostly because she is playing the wide-eyed newbie that we know is being naive and trusting the wrong people. I'm sure that will change and she will be less annoying once it does. I am terribly glad they fridged the strong-jawed boyfriend. I liked that actor on Boston Legal, but I was rather appalled by the prospect of watching him as an unironic leading man. This is also JJ Abrams' second TV pilot to fridge the heroine's boyfriend, so I give him props for inverting that trope.
I'm digging Walter and Peter so far, and there's enough mystery in their backstory to keep me coming back for a while. Also, the DVD's get kudos for putting warning labels on the special features that have spoilers for the season. Oh, would that other shows were as considerate (Deep Space Nine! *shakes fist*)
The disorienting thing was that a lot of the show was filmed at Sands Point, a place I have walked many times with my parents (and where the recent Renn Faire was). The inside of the Benjamins' house is there, as is the terrace overlooking the Sound. The most distracting bit was that they used part of the walking path, a little dell with a foot bridge, for all their scenes of the border of Gath. And I know that location so well it couldn't help but look like kids playing dress-up in their backyard to me. Like, oh, if you turn the camera just this way, you'd see the parking lot! I wonder if this is how people in Vancouver feel all the time.
I remember there being some dust-up on my f-list when this was airing about spoilers, but I can't remember who was upset or what the spoiler was and now I'm curious. Nothing in the series struck me as particularly earth shaking (and I say this with no deep knowledge of this part of the story in the Bible--I'm much more familiar with David's later life). In the commentary for the first episode, there was also a spoiler about a certain character getting killed...that wasn't killed. Unless I missed it. How odd.
Well, that was a crap film. I mean, that's what I expected. But it wasn't crap because it mucked about with the Iliad. I can deal with that. It was more that there wasn't really a main character. Or a main plot. I didn't care about anyone. It was just massive battle scene, some excuse to pause the action and have talky scenes (at one point, one of the people says, "I think that's enough for today," or something like that and both sides stop for the day which is just--what? seriously?) and then another massive battle scene. And since everyone knows about the Trojan horse, the movie had an inevitability that removed any possibility of dramatic tension.
Brad Pitt was awfully pretty in it, though. And I got a kick out of the fact that the Mycenaean throne room had the design from the Lion Gate blown up huge and over the throne. (One of my friends climbed on top of that gate, much to the horror of our classics professor chaperone.)
The thing about doing a movie about Troy is that this was the foundational story of the Greeks. After the fall of the Mycenaean civilization, there were a couple hundred years with no writing at all, and then when written works start appearing again, what are the first? The Iliad and the Odyssey. The story of Troy has so much richness, and says so much about how the Greeks viewed human nature and humanity's relationship to the gods, it seems impossible that with that story it could be turned into this flat, lifeless thing. And yet, there we go.
I've just started on Fringe--only five episodes in!--so please refrain from spoilers. So far it feels like an X-Files knock-off to me. I loved X-Files, but for its monster of the week episodes, not for its mytharc. And Fringe has the same hand-wavy, government conspiracy, let's jerk the audience around as much as possible and use "conspiracy" as an excuse for all our plot holes feel to it. Also, so far that monsters of the week have not been that thrilling and can barely help but be X-Files retreads. They seem to be trying for novelty by making them gorier.
And zero points from me for having a demon pregnancy in the second episode. It seems like an inevitability when there's a female lead. This is also terribly sexist of me, but I feel like male writers are way more obsessed with how horrifying pregnancy is than women. Don't get me wrong--pregnancy scares the shit out of me. But I'm kind of tired of being told how disgusting it is by male writers. It's like Stephen King's obsession with menstruation. Just stop it.
I also don't particularly like Olivia, but that's mostly because she is playing the wide-eyed newbie that we know is being naive and trusting the wrong people. I'm sure that will change and she will be less annoying once it does. I am terribly glad they fridged the strong-jawed boyfriend. I liked that actor on Boston Legal, but I was rather appalled by the prospect of watching him as an unironic leading man. This is also JJ Abrams' second TV pilot to fridge the heroine's boyfriend, so I give him props for inverting that trope.
I'm digging Walter and Peter so far, and there's enough mystery in their backstory to keep me coming back for a while. Also, the DVD's get kudos for putting warning labels on the special features that have spoilers for the season. Oh, would that other shows were as considerate (Deep Space Nine! *shakes fist*)